Three Differences of a Baby Born Natural to a Baby Born Cesarean
Clin Perinatol. Author manuscript; bachelor in PMC 2012 Jun one.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3110651
NIHMSID: NIHMS284291
Cesarean versus Vaginal Commitment: Long term babe outcomes and the Hygiene Hypothesis
Josef Neu
a Professor of Pediatrics, Sectionalisation of Neonatology, University of Florida; Gainesville, Florida
b Director, Neonatology Fellowship Grooming Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Jona Rushing
c Fellow, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Keywords: microbiota, mode of delivery, hygiene hypothesis
INTRODUCTION
In the United States the charge per unit of cesarean delivery (CD) has risen 48% since 1996, reaching a level of 31.viii% in 2007. 1 This trend is reflected in many parts of the world, with the well-nigh populous country in the world, China, approaching 50%2 and some individual clinics in Brazil approaching lxxx% 3. While a significant number of CD are preformed for obstetrical indications, some are but due to maternal request and may incur several risks for the child. Well known among these risks are neonatal low due to general anesthesia, fetal injury during hysterotomy and/or delivery, increased likelihood of respiratory distress fifty-fifty at term, and breastfeeding complications. Concurrent with the trend of increasing CD, there has been an epidemic of both autoimmune diseases such every bit type 1 diabetes, Crohn's disease, and multiple sclerosis and allergic diseases, such every bit asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis4 , v. The occurrence of these diseases is higher in more affluent, Western, industrialized countries. Several theories have emerged that suggest environmental influences are contributing to this phenomenon. Nigh notably, the "hygiene hypothesis" suggests that an overly make clean environment, especially in early childhood, may contribute to the development of several childhood diseases. It was first proposed past Strachan, who observed an inverse correlation betwixt hay fever and the number of older siblings. 6 This was later extended by others from the allergies to autoimmune diseases such as blazon i diabetes. v Whether the increase in CD incidence is also causally related will be addressed in this review.
The interplay betwixt the emerging microbial ecology of the alimentary canal and the developing mucosal immune organisation serves as a backdrop for a human relationship between CD and the emergence of some of these diseases. With the highly immunoreactive intestine serving as the largest surface area of the body that is exposed to the environment, especially a vast array of luminal microbes and antigens, information technology is intriguing to speculate that the intestinal environmental interaction during early development of the immune organization may relate to these diseases. One intriguing component of this relates to the early development of the abdominal microbiota, the developing immune system and the early influence of cesarean versus vaginal commitment (VD) on these phenomena. The immune system undergoes major evolution during infancy and is highly related to the microbes that colonize the intestinal tract.7 - 9 It has been suggested that different initial exposures depend on mode of delivery (VD vs. CD). The microbes that "seed' the intestine during either CD or VD may pb to changes in long term colonization and subsequent altering of immune development (Fig. 1). Here we will provide background about the human being microbiota, its relationship to the developing allowed system, and the relationship of mode of delivery on the colonization of the infant intestine, development of the immune system, and subsequent childhood allergies, asthma and autoimmune diseases.
THE Human MICROBIOTA
The human body, consisting of well-nigh 100 trillion cells, carries well-nigh ten times as many microorganisms in the intestines. ten - 12 It is estimated that these gut flora have around 100 times every bit many genes in amass as there are in the homo genome.13 The metabolic activities performed by these leaner resemble those of an organ, leading some to liken gut bacteria to a "forgotten" organ. 12 Microorganisms perform a host of useful functions, such as fermenting unused energy substrates, training the immune organization, preventing growth of harmful, pathogenic bacteria, regulating the evolution of the gut, and producing vitamins for the host (such as biotin and vitamin K). 14 Excitement most the potential of harnessing the abdominal microbiota for therapeutic purposes and wellness is reflected by the popularity of pro- and prebiotics and even such seemingly esoteric therapies as human being fecal transplantation. 15
Not all the species in the gut have been identified because most cannot be cultured, ten and identification is difficult. An effort to ameliorate draw the microflora of the gut and other body locations using newly developed not-culture based technologiesxvi has been initiated and termed the "Human being Microbiome Project"17. This project has a mission of generating resource enabling comprehensive characterization of the human being microbiota and analysis of its role in man health and affliction. Although the homo intestine is the site where most studies are being focused, other sites such every bit the skin, bladder, oral cavity and vagina harbor singled-out microbial populations and are probable to too play major roles in health and disease16.
Intestinal MICROECOLOGY OF THE FETUS AND NEWBORN
Most electric current literature suggests that the gastrointestinal tract of a normal fetus is sterile. During nascency and apace thereafter, bacteria from the mother and the surrounding surroundings colonize the infant'south gut. It is obvious that exposure at birth would differ past style of delivery. What long term sequelae or impact this departure in exposure may have on the kid has still to be determined.
Some recent research work suggests colonization may begin even earlier. While the paradigm has been that babies' intestines are sterile until birth, recent work found a microbial customs already domicile in the meconium of some babies built-in prematurely.eighteen It has also been shown that amniotic fluid of mothers with preterm labor contains a big and diverse spectrum of bacterial rDNA. 20 While a infant is in utero, information technology typically swallows 400 to 500 milliliters of amniotic fluid per twenty-four hours at term, and the hypothesis that intra-amniotic infection is the driving forcefulness behind preterm labor is one being widely studied in obstetrics.19 Whether the microbes or microbial components swallowed in the amniotic fluid stimulate an inflammatory response driving preterm birth remains to be evaluated. The outcome these organisms accept on the developing allowed system, bated from their role in preterm labor, likewise raises interesting questions.
Currently, very few studies have investigated the development of the homo microbiota after birth using non-civilization based techniques. In a step toward greater systematic investigation of babies born at term, Palmer et al.21 evaluated the developing microbiota of infants during the starting time twelvemonth later birth using microarray techniques to detect and quantify the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene sequences of most currently recognized species and taxonomic groups of bacteria; this was done along with sequencing of cloned libraries of PCR-amplified SSU rDNAto profile the microbial communities in fourteen good for you full-term infants during the first year after birth. To investigate possible origins of the infant microbiota, the researchers likewise profiled vaginal and milk samples from most of the mothers also every bit stool samples from all of the mothers, most of the fathers, and two siblings. The investigators found that the composition and temporal patterns of the microbial communities varied widely from infant to baby, but the singled-out features of each baby'southward microbial customs were recognizable for intervals of weeks to months. The strikingly parallel temporal patterns from a set of dizygotic twins suggested that incidental environmental exposures play a major role in determining the distinctive characteristics of the microbial community in each babe. Past the end of the kickoff year of life, microbial ecosystems in each babe, although still singled-out, had converged toward a profile characteristic of the adult alimentary canal. Of interest, Bifidobacteria were non found in these infants using these techniques. This could be highly pregnant in that it may debunk the large amount of attention this microbe has received as a potentially of import microbe that may exist harnessed as a probiotic. On the other hand, this could be a technical problem that still needs to exist solved using these newly developed methodologies.
Although a few studies have monitored the bacterial communities in preterm infants, our picture of the intestinal microbiota still remains limited. To decide whether noncultured bacteria represent an important part of the community in premature babies' intestinal ecosystems, Magne et al.22 used 16S rRNA genes and PCR-based electrophoretic profiling of 288 clones obtained from the fecal samples of 16 preterm infants. These were classified into 25 molecular species. The mean number of molecular species per infant was 3.25 and ranged from ane to eight. The researchers institute high interindividual variability. The main bacterial groups encountered belonged to the Enterobacteriaceae family and the genera Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus. The preterm infants were colonized by anaerobes and only four bifidobacteria (again seeming to minimize these taxa during development). The researchers did not decide the relative impacts of delivery mode, sex, gestational age, birth weight, historic period at sampling, feeding modes, and antibiotic therapies. They concluded that species diversity was low and interindividual variability was high in the feces of preterm infants, equally revealed by sequences of 16S rRNA genes and PCR-temporal temperature slope gel electrophoresis profiles (TGGE). The intestinal ecosystem of these preterm infants had no typical characteristic.
In summary, whether the fetal intestinal ecosystem is sterile at the time of birth remains a question. This may exist the case in some infants, but not necessarily in others, peculiarly preterms. This may in turn play a office in the initiation of preterm labor. Nevertheless, the species diversity does appear to exist low in well-nigh infants shortly later nativity, merely this increases with environmental exposure. Very little is currently known about the specific emergence of the microbial ecology of infants during the first year after birth and how this specifically relates to development of immunity and subsequent health and disease.
FUNCTIONS OF THE INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA
A comprehensive review of the functions of the intestinal microbiota is beyond the scope of this review, but here we wish to focus on the immunologic functions considering of their importance in development of the immune system and possible pathogenesis of several known allergic and autoimmune diseases. Abdominal leaner are key in promoting the early on development of the gut'south mucosal immune organization, both in terms of its physical components and function and go along to play a role later in life in its operation. The bacteria stimulate the lymphoid tissue associated with the gut mucosa to produce antibodies to pathogens. The allowed system recognizes and fights harmful leaner, but leaves the helpful species alone, a tolerance adult in infancy, and sometimes termed the "onetime friends" hypothesis. 23 (Figure ii) This hypothesis appears to exist a synthesis of the hygiene hypothesis that proposes that the role of these microorganisms that have evolve with humans provide an essential part in the establishment of the allowed arrangement wherein the microorganisms and the host have evolved a co-dependence: the most relevant organisms are those that co-evolved with mammals. These microorganisms are interacting with other modern environmental changes that as well lead to enhanced inflammatory responses such as inappropriate diet, obesity, psychological stress, vitamin D deficiency, pollution (dioxins), and perhaps even cesarean delivery. The range of chronic inflammatory disorders that is affected is potentially larger than usually assumed and include allergies, autoimmunity, inflammatory bowel disease, but besides vascular disease, some cancers, depression/anxiety and perhaps neurodegenerative disorders and type 2 diabetes.
"The Old Friends Hypothesis"
Mutual organisms collaborate with dendritic cells in the GI tract, leading to increased maturation of dendritic cells. When at that place is interaction with these organisms once more, the dendritic cells increment Treg maturation; not Th1 or Th2. This increases the baseline corporeality of anti-inflammatory cytokines, producing a Bystander Suppression. Another consequence of the increased number of mature dendritic cells is every bit they interact with self antigens, they increase the number Treg specific to these antigens. This is referred to as Specific Suppression. Together these 2 arms lead to tolerance of both self antigens equally well every bit those of helpful gut organisms.
Basic laboratory based research is supplementing the epidemiologic studies. Contempo findings have shown that gut bacteria play a role in the expression of Cost-like receptors (TLRs) in the intestines. TLRs are one of the two classes of pattern recognition receptors (PRR) that provide the intestine the power to discriminate between pathogenic and commensal bacteria. These PRRs identify the pathogens that take crossed the mucosal barrier and trigger a set of responses that take action against the pathogen, involving three main immunosensory cells: surface enterocytes, One thousand cells and dendritic cells.24 The other grade of PRRs are known as the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain/caspase recruitment domain isoforms (NOD/Carte), which are cytoplasmic proteins that recognize endogenous or microbial molecules or stress responses and form oligomers that activate inflammatory caspases. This would outcome in the cleavage and activation of important inflammatory cytokines and/or activate the NF-κB signaling pathway to induce the production of inflammatory molecules. 24
Bacteria can influence the miracle known as oral tolerance, in which the immune organisation is less sensitive to an antigen (including those produced by gut bacteria) in one case it has been ingested. This tolerance, mediated in part by the gastrointestinal immune system and in role by the liver, tin reduce overreactive immune responses similar those found in allergies and auto-immune affliction.25
In that location are several antenatal and perinatal events that might likewise affect the development of the intestinal microbial environmental. Therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics is a common practice for mothers who go into premature labor or who take a CD. This treatment tin can reduce the biodiversity of the fecal microbiota and may be a factor in the cause of necrotizing enterocolitis. 26 , 27 Studies in mice show that intestinal commensal microbiota have an influence on early postnatal immune development via interactions with abdominal Price like receptors, which in plough are probable to influence the development of the mucosal allowed system and mucosal-related diseases.28 Other studies suggest that specific microbes may induce regulatory T-jail cell development. For example, a prominent human commensal, Bacteroides fragilis, directs the development of Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) with a unique "inducible" genetic signature. 29 Monocolonization of sanitary animals with B. fragilis increases the suppressive chapters of Tregs and induces anti-inflammatory cytokine production exclusively from Foxp3(+) T cells in the gut. This effect appears to be mediated by an immunomodulatory molecule, polysaccharide A (PSA), of B. fragilis, which mediates the conversion of CD4(+) T cells into Foxp3(+) Treg cells that produce IL-10 during commensal colonization. Functional Foxp3(+) Treg cells are likewise produced past PSA during intestinal inflammation, and Toll-like receptor two signaling is required for both Treg induction and IL-x expression. These studies also show that PSA is non simply able to prevent, but too cure experimental colitis in animals and therefore demonstrate that B. fragilis Treg lineage differentiation pathway in the gut to actively induce mucosal tolerance.29
VAGINAL VS. CESAREAN Commitment
During vaginal delivery, the contact with the maternal vaginal and abdominal flora is an important source for the start of the infant'southward colonization. During CD, this directly contact is absent, and not-maternally derived environmental bacteria play an of import role for infants' intestinal colonization.31 Some authors accept suggested that the composition of the very first homo microbiota could have long lasting effects on the intestine in breast fed infants. For instance, Gronlund, et al 32 showed that the primary gut flora in infants built-in by cesarean commitment may exist disturbed for up to 6 months after nascency. Another study using culture based techniques showed that the mode of delivery was associated with differences in intestinal microbes 7 years after delivery. 33 The clinical relevance of these changes is unknown, and even longer follow-upwards is needed to constitute how long-lasting these alterations of the primary gut flora can be.
Nevertheless, at that place is accumulating evidence that abdominal bacteria play an important role in the postnatal evolution of the allowed organization. 30 Thus, if the intestinal flora develops differently depending on the manner of delivery, the postnatal development of the allowed system might also be different. Available epidemiological information show that atopic diseases appear more ofttimes in infants after cesarean delivery than after vaginal delivery.34 - 37 The limerick of enteric microbiota in early days of life seems, therefore, to be a very important factor for achieving and maintaining expert health in the years to come up. It follows that it is fundamental to identify more thoroughly the intestinal ecosystem of the newborn.
Although in that location is an increasing torso of evidence that the abdominal microbiota play an essential role in the postnatal development of the immune system, the mechanisms remain poorly understood. Malamitsi-Puchner et al.38 establish that only vaginal delivery promotes the production of diverse cytokines implicated in neonatal immunity. Hallstrom et al. 39 found a link betwixt cesarean delivery, disturbed intestinal colonization, and, possibly, occurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants. Although the epidemiological studies demonstrated that elective cesarean delivery provides an increased risk for allergic diseases in after childhood, misreckoning factors could too play intermediate roles. Data available from several studies indicate a delayed onset of lactation with cesarean section.forty , 41 Thus, many infants born by cesarean commitment also lacked the early support of breast milk as stimulator for a physiological intestinal flora. Both the nonphysiological start of colonization and the missing early dietary support by delayed start of lactation might issue in these long-lasting effects.
Babies are born with immunological tolerance that is instructed by the mother by preferential induction of regulatory T lymphocytes42, which might allow the baby to become colonized by this first inoculum. The mechanism is via substantial numbers of maternal cells crossing the placenta to reside in fetal lymph nodes, inducing the development of CD4+CD25highFoxP3+ Tregs that suppress fetal anti-maternal amnesty and persist at least until early adulthood. All the same, only a subset (if any) of the microbes to which the newborn is initially exposed will permanently colonize available niches and contribute to the distinctive microbiota harbored by the body habitats of adults. 21 Equally more than and more deliveries bypass the vagina, babies may non be exposed to these microbes at birth. Differences in commitment fashion have been linked with differences in the abdominal microbiota of babies.31 , 32 , 43 , 44 Initial communities may serve every bit a direct source of protective or pathogenic bacteria very early in life.
Another recent study45, offers a detailed look at the early on stages of the body's colonization by microbes. Babies built-in vaginally were colonized predominantly by Lactobacillus, whereas cesarean delivery babies were colonized by a mixture of potentially pathogenic leaner typically plant on the skin and in hospitals, such as Staphylococcus and Acinetobacter, due southuggesting babies born by CD were colonized with pare flora in lieu of traditionally vaginal type of bacterium.
The event of way of delivery on development of childhood affliction has just recently begun to exist explored (Table ane). The upshot appears to be about robust in the area of immune mediated diseases. CD has been associated with a significant increased rate of asthma, especially in females, and allergic rhinitis, but not atopic dermatitis.46 This increase was fifty-fifty more apparent when accounting for the factors surrounding the CD. The risk of asthma was increased past 60% in females who underwent a repeat cesarean without ruptured membranes versus those babies with ruptured membranes and/or labor prior to CD.46
Tabular array 1
| Cesarean Delivery Associated Babyhood Diseasesone , ii | |
|---|---|
| Allergic Rhinitis | |
| All Cesareans | ane.37 (1.14-1.63) |
| Repeat Cesareans Only | 1.78 (1.34-ii.37) |
| Asthma | |
| All Cesareans | one.24 (ane.01-1.53) |
| Female | 1.53 (ane.10-2.ten) |
| Female & Echo Cesarean three | 1.83 (1.xiii-ii.97) |
| Celiac Disease | ane.80 (1.13-2.88) |
| Diabetes Mellitus (Type 1) | 1.19 (1.04-1.36) |
| Gastroenteritis 4 | 1.31 (1.24-ane.38) |
| Gastroenteritis AND Asthma | ane.74 (1.36-2.23) |
Children born by CD are too significantly more likely to endure from celiac disease and to be hospitalized for gastroenteritis.47 No clan has been found between CD and Crohn'southward disease or ulcerative colitis. However, while preterm birth has been implicated in the evolution of inflammatory bowel disease, way of commitment has non 48
Type I Diabetes Mellitus has been on the ascension in recent decades, mirroring the ascent in CD.49 Meta-analysis institute a nineteen% increase in Type I DM in cesarean children when controlling for confounders such every bit gestational age, maternal age, and nascence weight. 50 A recent retrospective study of children in Scotland failed to show such an clan. 51 However, information technology is important to point out that the Scotland study had a very small number of subjects (n=361) compared to the meta-analysis (due north=9938) and the rate of CD was but xiv% in the Scottish report (much below the US boilerplate).
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
While CD is necessary in mod obstetrics, the process appears to shift a baby's first bacterial community. A better understanding of this early on colonization, which is also influenced by events such as breast-feeding, may lead to medical practices for establishing healthy bacterial colonization. The causal relationship between CD, the shift in microbiota and many childhood diseases continues to be studied. However, in that location are several problems with the studies we have reviewed here.
It is impossible to lump CD into one category without delineating the indication for CD. It stands to reason that a fetus delivered afterwards abort at 8 centimeters dilation afterwards a long labor would be exposed to a much different microbial surroundings than a fetus that undergoes CD for maternal request prior to rupture of membranes. It is naïve to think that the fetus is merely exposed to microbes as the head passes through the vaginal introitus onto the perineum and to ignore the abiding exposure to vaginal flora afterwards rupture of membranes. Sonntag et al 48 failed to show a relationship between mode of delivery and inflammatory bowel disease. However, the average historic period of a subject in this written report was 42 years old. Indication for CD in the late 1960'due south, prior to common use of external fetal monitoring, is strikingly different than modernistic obstetrical indications. The intrapartum exposures of these subjects is most likely vastly different than a more gimmicky accomplice. Time to come studies must exist more meticulous in categorizing CD to fully empathise the effect of CD on colonization and childhood disease.
The part of antepartum and intrapartum antibiotics must besides be accounted for in future studies. What consequence, if whatsoever, these have on the microbiota of the fetus and/or subsequent evolution of disease is unknown. Near 20% of women in the Us are colonized with Group B Streptococcus and will subsequently receive intrapartum antibiotics. Standard of care besides dictates that antibiotics be administered prior to cesarean commitment and to mothers in preterm labor and/or with premature prolonged rupture of membranes. Given all of this, the exposure to antenatal antibiotics is pregnant. Dominguez-Bello 45 noted a difference in fetal colonization based on mode of delivery. However, none of their vaginally delivered patients received antibiotics and the cesarean cases received cephalosporin "several hours" prior to incision which is not the recommended course in the U.s.. Whether this exposure accounts for the deviation, or if fetuses who receive antibiotics per standard guidelines in the United states of america show a different colonization pattern, is an of import inquiry area to explore.
The link betwixt style of delivery and subsequent babyhood pathology is an important 1. This becomes fifty-fifty more of import as maternal desire for primary cesarean delivery is on the ascension and rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) are declining in this country. This new data about colonization differences with differing modes of commitment seems to be taking the hygiene hypothesis to an entirely new level.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early on version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable course. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that utilise to the journal pertain.
Dr. Neu is an Advisory Board Fellow member for Mead Johnson and Medela.
~ The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step. ~
Lao Tsu
REFERENCES
ane. Hamilton Exist, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: Preliminary Data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2009;57(12):1–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
two. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu M, et al. Method of commitment and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007—08. The Lancet. 2010;375(9713):490–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
iii. Rebelo F, da Rocha CM, Cortes TR, et al. Loftier cesarean prevalence in a national population-based study in Brazil: the role of individual exercise. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(seven):903–viii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
four. Okada H, Kuhn C, Feillet H, et al. The 'hygiene hypothesis' for autoimmune and allergic diseases: an update. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;160(1):1–ix. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Bach JF. The result of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(12):911–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Caicedo RA, Schanler RJ, Li Due north, Neu J. The developing intestinal ecosystem: implications for the neonate. Pediatr Res. 2005;58(4):625–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Rautava S, Walker WA. Commensal bacteria and epithelial cross talk in the developing intestine. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2007;9(5):385–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
nine. Eberl G, Lochner Thou. The development of intestinal lymphoid tissues at the interface of self and microbiota. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;two(six):478–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ten. Sears CL. A dynamic partnership: celebrating our gut flora. Anaerobe. 2005;11(five):247–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Steinhoff U. Who controls the oversupply? New findings and sometime questions almost the intestinal microflora. Immunol Lett. 2006;99(1):12–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464(7285):59–65. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xiv. Guarner F, Malagelada JR. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):512–nine. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xv. Khoruts A, Dicksved J, Jansson JK, et al. Changes in the composition of the human fecal microbiome after bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44(5):354–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Dethlefsen L, McFall-Ngai M, Relman DA. An ecological and evolutionary perspective on homo-microbe mutualism and disease. Nature. 2007;449(7164):811–eight. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Grouping NHW, Peterson J, Garges S, et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Projection. Genome Res. 2009;19(12):2317–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xviii. Mshvildadze Chiliad, Neu J, Schuster J, et al. Intestinal microbial ecology in premature infants assessed with non-culture-based techniques. J Pediatr. 2010;156(one):20–5. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
nineteen. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, et al. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Amogan HP, et al. Microbial prevalence, diversity and affluence in amniotic fluid during preterm labor: a molecular and culture-based investigation. PLoS Ane. 2008;3(8):e3056. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Palmer C, Bik EM, Digiulio DB, et al. Evolution of the Man Infant Abdominal Microbiota. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(7):e177. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Magne F, Abély M, Boyer F, et al. Low species diversity and high interindividual variability in faeces of preterm infants as revealed by sequences of 16S rRNA genes and PCR-temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis profiles. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006;57(1):128–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Rook GA. 99th Dahlem conference on infection, inflammation and chronic inflammatory disorders: darwinian medicine and the 'hygiene' or 'old friends' hypothesis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;160(ane):70–90. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Circular JL, O'Connell RM, Mazmanian SK. Coordination of tolerogenic allowed responses by the commensal microbiota. J Autoimmun. 2010;34(3):J220–5. [PMC gratuitous commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Cotten CM, Taylor Due south, Stoll B, et al. Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic handling is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and expiry for extremely depression birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2009;123(i):58–66. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Wang Y, Hoenig JD, Malin KJ, et al. 16S rRNA factor-based analysis of fecal microbiota from preterm infants with and without necrotizing enterocolitis. ISME J. 2009;3(8):944–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Dimmitt RA, Staley EM, Chuang Grand, et al. Function of Postnatal Acquisition of the Intestinal Microbiome in the Early Evolution of Immune Part. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 [PMC costless article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Circular JL, Mazmanian SK. Inducible Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell development by a commensal bacterium of the abdominal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U South A. 2010;107(21):12204–nine. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Björkstén B. Effects of abdominal microflora and the environs on the development of asthma and allergy. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2004;25(iii-4):257–seventy. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Biasucci G, Benenati B, Morelli L, et al. Cesarean commitment may bear on the early biodiversity of intestinal bacteria. J Nutr. 2008;138(9):1796S–800S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Grönlund MM, Lehtonen OP, Eerola Due east, et al. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by unlike methods of delivery: permanent changes in intestinal flora subsequently cesarean delivery. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999;28(1):nineteen–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Salminen S, Gibson GR, McCartney AL, et al. Influence of mode of delivery on gut microbiota composition in seven year onetime children. Gut. 2004;53(9):1388–9. [PMC costless commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Negele K, Heinrich J, Borte M, et al. Mode of delivery and development of atopic disease during the first 2 years of life. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004;15(1):48–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Debley JS, Smith JM, Redding GJ, et al. Childhood asthma hospitalization risk after cesarean delivery in sometime term and premature infants. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;94(2):228–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Laubereau B, Filipiak-Pittroff B, von Berg A, et al. Caesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and sensitisation during the starting time year of life. Curvation Dis Child. 2004;89(11):993–7. [PMC costless commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Eggesbø M, Botten G, Stigum H, et al. Is delivery by cesarean section a risk cistron for food allergy? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(ii):420–six. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Malamitsi-Puchner A, Protonotariou E, Boutsikou T, et al. The influence of the way of commitment on circulating cytokine concentrations in the perinatal flow. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81(4):387–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Hällström G, Eerola E, Vuento R, et al. Effects of mode of delivery and necrotising enterocolitis on the intestinal microflora in preterm infants. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;23(6):463–lxx. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Dewey KG, Nommsen-Rivers LA, Heinig MJ, et al. Risk factors for suboptimal infant breastfeeding behavior, delayed onset of lactation, and excess neonatal weight loss. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3Pt1):607–nineteen. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Evans KC, Evans RG, Royal R, et al. Event of caesarean section on chest milk transfer to the normal term newborn over the first week of life. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88(5):F380–2. [PMC costless article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Mold JE, Michaëlsson J, Burt TD, et al. Maternal alloantigens promote the development of tolerogenic fetal regulatory T cells in utero. Science. 2008;322(5907):1562–5. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Mackie RI, Sghir A, Gaskins HR. Developmental microbial ecology of the neonatal alimentary canal. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(five):1035S–45S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Penders J, Thijs C, Vink C, et al. Factors influencing the limerick of the intestinal microbiota in early on infancy. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):511–two. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M, et al. Delivery way shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(26):11971–5. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Renz-Polster H, David MR, Buist As, et al. Caesarean section delivery and the risk of allergic disorders in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35(11):1466–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Decker East, Engelmann 1000, Findeisen A, et al. Cesarean delivery is associated with celiac illness only non inflammatory bowel disease in children. Pediatrics. 2010;125(6):e1433–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Sonntag B, Stolze B, Heinecke A, et al. Preterm birth but not mode of delivery is associated with an increased risk of developing inflammatory bowel illness afterwards in life. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;xiii(eleven):1385–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Onkamo P, Vaananen S, Karvonen M, et al. Worldwide increment in incidence of Type I diabetes--the analysis of the information on published incidence trends. Diabetologia. 1999;42(12):1395–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Cardwell CR, Stene LC, Joner G, et al. Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of babyhood-onset type i diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetologia. 2008;51(five):726–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Robertson L, Harrild Chiliad. Maternal and neonatal take chances factors for childhood type one diabetes: a matched case-control study. BMC Public Health. 2010;27(10):281. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Three Differences of a Baby Born Natural to a Baby Born Cesarean
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110651/